James J. Pisanelle
Nevada Bar No. 4027
Nicki L Wilmer
Nevada Bar No. 6562
SCHRECK BRIGNONE
[[ address ]]

Michael P Kenny, Esq.
James A Harvey, Esq.
David J Stewart, Esq.
Christopher A Riley, Esq.
Douglas L. Bridges, Esq/
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
[[ ADDRESS ]]

Attorneys for Defendant AutoZone, Inc.

United States District Court District of Nevada
The SCO Group, Inc.
a Delaware Corporation

  Plaintiff,
v.

AUTOZONE, INC.
A Nevada Corporation

  Defendant.

Civil Action File No.

CV-S-04-0237-RCG-LRL

DEFENDANT AUTOZONE, INC.'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO
PLAINTIFF THE SCO GROUP, INC.

Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter "FRCP"), Defendant Autozone, Inc. ("Autozone" or "Defendant") requests that Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO" or "Plaintiff") respond to the following Interrogatories, In accordance with FRCP 33, each interrogatory is to be answered fully and in writing under oath within thirty (30) days after service hereof.

Each interrogatory is addressed to the knowledge of SCO, as well as to knowledge, information or documents in the possession, custody or control of SCO and SCO's Attorneys, Accountants, Agents, employees or officers.

AutoZone incorporates herein by reference each of the Instructions and Definitions contained in Defendant AutoZone, Inc's first Requests for Production of Documents and Things to Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc., served concurrently Herewith. Each of the Definitions Apply with respect to each of the Following Interrogatories, and each of the terms defined therein, when used in any Interrogatory below, shall have the meaning given therein

1. Identify with specificity each copyrighted work that you allege AutoZone has infringed, Including, but not limited to, each of the works identified in Paragraph 2 of SCO's Injunctive Relief Statement. For source code, identify the specific lines of code that you allege AutoZone has infringed. For non-source code, identify the specific lines or sections of materials that you allege AutoZone has infringed

2. For each line of code identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1, (a) identify all products in which, in whole or in part, the code is included or on which, in whole or in part, the code is based and (b) identify whether SCO has ever distributed the source code under the GPL, LGPL or any other open source license, and if so, the circumstances and license under which it was distributed or otherwise made available

3. Identify the author(s) of each work identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1 above.

4. Describe in detail when and how SCO obtained ownership of the Copyright of each work identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1 above.

5. Identify by registration Number the United States copyright Registration for each copyrighted work identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1 above

6. Describe with specificity how AutoZone has infringed the copyright in each work identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1 above.

7. Identify the date when SCO first learned that AutoZone was migrating, or had migrated, from OpenServer to Linux.

8. Identify the date when SCO first learned that Autozone had allegedly infringed each of the copyrighted works identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1 above.

9. Describe in detail all harm that you are suffering as a result of each alleged act of infringement identified in response to Interrogatory No. 6 above.

10. Identify all persons who have knowledge or information regarding the creation of the works identified in response to Request No. 1 above, and describe in detail the substance of each person's knowledge.

11. Identify all persons who have knowledge or information regarding your ownership of the copyrights identified in response to Request No. 1 above, and describe in detail the substance of each person's knowledge.

12. Identify all persons who have knowledge or information regarding your claims that AutoZone has infringed the copyright identified in response to interrogatory No. 1 above, including, without limitation, each of the SCO employees referenced in lines 7 & 8 of Paragraph 2 of SCO's Injunctive Relief Statement, and describe in detail the substance of each person's knowledge.

13. Identify all facts documents and other information in your possession, custody or control that support your stated belief that "it is reasonably likely that AutoZone copied SCO's copyright materials during the migration process in violation of its contracts with SCO and in violation of Federal Copyright laws," as stated in Paragraph 2 of SCO's Injunctive Relief Statement, and identify all individuals with knowledge of the same.

Identify each expert witness that you will call to provide testimony on your behalf in support of your anticipated motion for preliminary injunction, and, for each expert, state the subject matter and a summary of each such expert's testimony.

This 1st day of September, 2004

[[ signature }}
James J. Pisanelli, Esq.
Nicki L. Wilmer, Esq. SCHRECK BRIGNONE [[ ADDRESS ]]

Attorneys for defendant
AutoZone, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of the within and foregoing DEFENDANT AUTOZONE, INC.'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF THE SCO GROUP, INC. upon all council of record addressed as follows:

This 1st day of September, 2004.

[[signature]]
An employee of Schreck Brignone

atl-1/1173000v: